When digital platform companies become aware that their users have been exposed to risks, or are likely to be exposed in the future, they often do not have a playbook of effective communication practices that go beyond narrow notification requirements. The standard approaches — ranging from lengthy legal documents to easily dismissed pop-ups — typically fail to inform users in ways that enable better decision-making.
This challenge is at the center of a new CLTC report, Designing Risk Communications: A Roadmap for Digital Platforms, that looks at some of the existing risk communication practices used in technology and other industries, and provides a framework that digital platforms can use to more effectively communicate risks to their users. Published as part of the CLTC White Paper Series, the report was authored by Jessica Newman, CLTC Research Fellow and Program Lead for the AI Security Initiative; Ann Cleaveland, CLTC’s Executive Director; Grace Gordon, a Master of Development Practice student at UC Berkeley who was a 2020 Summer Graduate Student Researcher at CLTC; and Steven Weber, Faculty Director of CLTC and current Associate Dean and Head of School of the UC Berkeley School of Information.
The report highlights relevant existing examples of risk communication from digital platforms, such as Facebook’s Privacy Checkup and Apple’s recently released privacy nutrition labels, which give consumers a quick, scannable glimpse into the potential privacy risks of a digital service prior to using it. The authors also draw on examples from other domains, such as the Aviation Safety Reporting System, which is used to capture and communicate potential risks across the aviation industry, and the Drug Facts Box, which aims to communicate side effects and other information to consumers of over-the-counter and prescription drugs.
These examples provide the foundation for a “roadmap” that can serve as a preliminary guide for digital platforms trying to redefine how they communicate risks with users. The roadmap draws from insights at the intersection of decision science, psychology, sociology, and communications, and proposes three practices that digital platform firms can adopt to improve risk communications, including:
- Engagement: Build trusting relationships with users based on transparent, comprehensive dialogue to facilitate effective risk communication.
- Design: Create accessible, informative, and actionable communication formats to enable effective risk communication.
- Evaluation: Establish processes for risk communication in advance, and create metrics to assess effectiveness and ensure the resilience of risk communication efforts.
“Decades of literature about the science of risk communication, combined with lessons from other sectors, provide a fresh take on how digital platforms can improve meaningful dialogue and engagement with users about potential risks,” the authors write. “In an environment of expanding digital risks and growing distrust of technology companies, a shared roadmap for risk communications can leverage the interdependence of many digital platforms, help ‘raise all boats,’ and support an improved environment for both users and digital platform firms.”